Not-So-Zen and the Art of Voluntary Agreements â€” If you haven’t already seen it, be sure to read Kurt Sutter’s essay on Google and copyright. “Iâ€™m sure Mr. and Mrs. Google are very nice people. But the big G doesnâ€™t contribute anything to the work of creatives. Not a minute of effort or a dime of financing. Yet Google wants to take our content, devalue it, and make it available for criminals to pirate for profit.”
Copyright Holders Look for an Antipiracy DMCA Upgrade â€” Speaking of voluntary agreements, yesterday the USPTO held its first in a planned series of public multistakeholder forums designed to create voluntary solutions to improve the functioning of the DMCA notice and takedown process within the current statutory framework. A consensus emerged that stakeholders would begin by tackling the standardization of the process and then going from there.
Sean O’Connor: The Overlooked French Influence on the Intellectual Property Clause â€” Fantastic article. I’m still digesting Prof. O’Connor’s conclusions, but his stocktake on literature analyzing the interpretation of the Copyright Clause is incredibly comprehensive and should prove invaluable to anyone interested in the subject.
Court gags Dotcom bodyguard â€” Kim Dotcom, self-proclaimed free speech advocate, has successfully gotten a court to prohibit a former employee from speaking out in public about his time in Dotcom’s employ.
MP3Tunes Founder Michael Robertson Found Liable for Copyright Infringement â€” Earlier this week, YouTube and Viacom settled their long-running litigation, leaving open the question of when, if ever, a service provider could lose DMCA protection because of willful blindness. Just a day later, a jury answered: here.